Skip to main content

The Intellectual Architects: The "Minus-Two" Legacy and the "Tagging" Industry

 For decades, the names Motiur Rahman (Prothom Alo) and Mahfuz Anam (The Daily Star) were synonymous with the "progressive" elite of Bangladesh. However, the 2016 televised admission by Mahfuz Anam—confessing to his "biggest mistake"—exposed a deeper, structural relationship between the nation's leading editors and the external forces that sought to reshape Bangladesh’s political destiny. By serving as conduits for intelligence-fed reports and systematically "tagging" sovereign dissenters as extremists, these papers functioned as the narrative engine for the 17-year status quo supported by New Delhi.

I. The 2016 Admission: A Glimpse into the "Minus-Two" Formula

In February 2016, Mahfuz Anam appeared on ATN News and admitted that during the 2007–2008 military-backed caretaker government, he published unverified, corruption-related stories against Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia. These stories were "fed" to him by the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) (bdnews24, 2016).

  • The "Minus-Two" Strategy: This was not a mere journalistic lapse; it was a coordinated attempt by civil-military elites and regional stakeholders to "minus" both major political leaders from the scene. The goal was to install a "compliant" and "technocratic" government that would align more closely with the regional security interests of neighbors like India (CPJ, 2016).

  • The Follow-up Trap: While the admission was meant to show contrition, it revealed a historical pattern where the country's top editors were willing to act as "information agents" for unconstitutional forces. Critics argue that once the Awami League returned to power in 2009, these editors traded their "neutrality" for "protection," becoming the primary tools for the regime's next phase: the "Militant Tagging" era.

II. The "Tagging" Industry: 2013–2018 Crackdowns

Between 2013 and 2018, as the Awami League moved to consolidate absolute power, Prothom Alo and The Daily Star perfected the art of Selective Labeling. By framing all opposition as a choice between "Secularism" and "Radicalism," they provided the intellectual justification for the regime's most brutal crackdowns.

The EventThe Editorial "Tag"The Reality / Strategic Result
2013 Motijheel SiegeLabeled the protesters (Hefazat) as "Anti-Liberation" and "Taliban-style" radicals (Daily Star, 2013).This allowed the state to use excessive force with minimal international blowback, framing a mass movement as a security threat to India.
2014 & 2018 ElectionsOften framed the BNP’s boycott not as a demand for fair elections, but as "Sabotage" by extremist-linked parties.Secured international (and Indian) silence on vote-rigging by prioritizing "Stability over Democracy" (The Diplomat, 2025).
Extrajudicial KillingsUsed "Intelligence-fed" terminology like "Crossfire with militants" to report on the deaths of political activists (DiVA, 2011).By adopting the state’s vocabulary, they helped normalize the RAB's culture of impunity.

III. The Indian Agenda: Sovereignty as "Extremism"

The most significant criticism against Rahman and Anam is their role in filtering Indian-aligned narratives. Whenever activists questioned Indian hegemony—whether regarding border killings, transit deals, or water sharing—these papers frequently redirected the conversation toward "Islamist threats."

  • Manufacturing Panic: By amplifying reports from Indian intelligence-linked outlets, they helped create a "permanent state of alarm" that convinced the West that any alternative to the Awami League would lead to an Islamic caliphate.

  • The "Delhi Star" Backlash: The 2025 attacks on their offices were fueled by the public perception that these editors had become "The Second Defense Line" for New Delhi (Alt News, 2025). Their focus on "Minority Persecution" in 2025 was seen by many as a recycled "Information War" tactic to delegitimize the sovereign 2024 Revolution.

IV. Conclusion: The Cost of Compromised Journalism

The tragedy of Prothom Alo and The Daily Star is that they sold the soul of Bangladeshi journalism for a seat at the table of regional power. By using "extremism" as a tag to suppress legitimate political aspirations, Motiur Rahman and Mahfuz Anam didn't just protect a regime—they helped export the nation’s sovereignty. As Bangladesh seeks "fundamental reforms" in 2026, the media's first reform must be an end to the "tagging" that turned journalists into tools of external hegemony.

Citations & Key Sources

  • bdnews24.com (2016): Daily Star Editor Mahfuz Anam admits to publishing DGFI-fed baseless stories.

  • CPJ (2016): Legal challenges pile up for Daily Star editor who admitted error in judgment.

  • The Diplomat (2025): Terrorism in Bangladesh: Political Manipulation and the Media's Role.

  • Alt News (Dec 2025): The "Delhi Star" Controversy: Why Media Outlets are Being Targeted in Bangladesh.

  • DiVA Portal (2011): A Critical Discourse Analysis of Bangladeshi English-Language Editorials.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The New Face of an Old Playbook: Why Bangladesh Must Prosecute the Enablers of the July Massacre

 A classic political maneuver is playing out across the media landscape of Bangladesh: the deployment of structural propaganda designed to rehabilitate the architectural pillars of the previous fascist regime. The recent, bizarrely structured "Health Management Roundtable" hosted by the UNICEF-led Bangladesh Child Protection Initiative was never an innocent public policy debate. It was an offensive display of old-school Awami League (BAL) propaganda machinery, engineered to launder the public images of individuals heavily accused of collaborating in the historic July 2024 massacres. The strategy is transparent. When a political faction loses its grip on executive power, its remaining infrastructure—deeply supported by regional alignment from Indian agencies—shifts toward information warfare. By manufacturing a false crisis around national vaccine procurement and health policies, this network aims to panic the public, discredit the subsequent governance framework, and quietly ...
1 comment
Read more

India as a Global Hub for Minority Repression

  For decades, the world viewed India as the "world’s largest democracy." However, as 2025 progresses, that title is being replaced by a much darker moniker in the halls of the United Nations , the White House , and the European Union . Extensive reports from the world’s most credible human rights monitors now characterize India as a "hotbed" of systemic violence and targeted killings of its Muslim minority. 1 The narrative of a pluralistic state is being dismantled by a reality of state-backed vigilantism and institutionalized discrimination. I. The "Killings with Impunity": White House and USCIRF Reports The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) , in its 2025 Annual Report , has officially recommended that the U.S. State Department designate India as a "Country of Particular Concern" (CPC) —a status reserved for the world’s most egregious human rights violators. 2 Cow Vigilantism and Targeted Murders: The report...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Extremism Narrative: A Tool for Rule in Bangladesh

  For nearly 17 years, a dominant narrative echoed from Dhaka to New Delhi and beyond: Bangladesh was a bulwark of secularism standing against a rising tide of violent religious extremism. This frame—championed by the  Awami League (AL)  and supported by its primary regional ally,  India —was not merely a security assessment; it served as a powerful political instrument that redefined the boundaries of dissent and legitimacy in the country. The Architecture of the Narrative The "extremism" tag was built on a dual-threat foundation: the historical baggage of the 1971 Liberation War and the post-9/11 global "War on Terror."  By equating political opposition with religious fundamentalism, the AL administration effectively achieved two goals: De-legitimizing the Opposition:  The  Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)  and  Jamaat-e-Islami  were consistently framed as "patrons of terror."  Any political protest or strike was often branded a...
Post a Comment
Read more